Headline News
Secure Blackphone starts shipping (June 30, 2014 10:03 am)
Linux Mint KDE reviewed (June 24, 2014 2:06 pm)
Linux Mint 17 “Qiana” KDE released! (June 23, 2014 10:24 am)
7 Improvements The Linux Desktop Needs (June 21, 2014 12:48 am)

Developers from Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan & Syria can’t contribute to US based open source projects?

Unless they choose not to tell where they are from. To tackle the issue Fedora project has adopted the “don’t ask don’t tell” policy for contribution.

I am aware of situations where Open Source companies based out of US can’t offer free software to those countries which are in US’s embargo list, but something interesting popped out today when FESCo debated the issue whether Fedora should allow ‘contribution’ from such countries. Fedora’s sponsor Red Hat is a US based company and thus has to adhere to US laws so it’s tricky whether they can use the free software contribution from embargoed countries or not.

A ticket was created by lkundrak asking:

It has come to my attention that a sponsor suspecting contributor’s residence due to his nationality might exclude him from participating in the project. I’m wondering whether it’s encouraged, discouraged, mandatory or forbidden that sponsors try to determine contributor’s nationality and area of residence. If it’s not discouraged or forbidden, I’d like to be aware what reliable means of determining the location and nationality should we use. I’d like to find out a reliable way to find out whether a piece of third party open-source code can be included in Fedora, taking the country of origin restrictions into account.

lkundrak seek advice from FESCo to suggest “changes to contributor’s documentation so that next time we know in advance and make no mistakes.”

The issue was triggered when a developer from Sudan, named Mohammed Isam, wanted to get involved with Fedora development. Petr Šabata said that while he would love to sponsor Islam he would have to check with Fedora legal as Sudan is in the Sanctioned list. Mohammed Isam added that he doesn’t live or work from Sudan; he was based out of Quatar.

Today FESCo made a decision about it. The solution is – ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell.’ FESCo recommends that “Sponsors (or any other contributors) in Fedora should not make any effort to determine a contributor’s nationality, country of origin, or area of residence.”

But there can be cases where the nationality of the contributor is revealed then they have to ‘tell. “If a potential contributor independently (and explicitly) reveals their nationality, country of origin, or area of residence, and that nationality, country of origin, or area of residence is in one of the export restricted countries, then they are required to bring that information to the attention of Fedora Legal ”

In case of Mohammed Isam, Fedora Legal team cleared the he can contribute.

We are looking for aspiring bloggers and journalists for The Mukt. If you are interested, apply now!

There are quite some open source projects based out of US, what will they do? We will talk to some projects and update the story.

Swapnil Bhartiya

A free software fund-a-mental-ist and Charles Bukowski fan, Swapnil also writes fiction and tries to find cracks in the paper armours of proprietary companies. Swapnil has been covering Linux and Free Software/Open Source since 2005.


  1. Months ago there was a related controversy related to the Fedora’s IRC channel. It ended shamefully.

    “Unfortunately, Red Hat cannot provide Fedora software, documentation or support to individuals in Embargoed Nations, because of US export law.”


  2. Pingback: Developers from Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan & Syria Can’t Contribute to US Based Open Source Projects? | Linux news

  3. Pingback: Developers from Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan & Syria Can’t Contribute to US Based Open Source Projects? | JME

    • They are talking about a more recent ticket[*] (Phoronix also did). Anyway, this is an interesting matter. Abrazos mi amigo!


      • Si lo vi, pero todo viene de lo mismo, la manzana podrida no cae lejos del arbol, abrazo german

  4. Pingback: Developers from Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan & Syria Can’t Contribute to US Based Open Source Projects? « LinuxLife Blog

  5. Pingback: News Roundup: Free Software/Open Source Software | Techrights

  6. Pingback: Developers from Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan & Syria Can’t Contribute to US Based Open Source Projects? | linux.malyblog.cba.pl

  7. Shows the value of a “Chinese Wall” of separation between for-profit firm and non-profit NGO, and a similar API wall between an operating system and a particular app. Of course, the more recent conversation shows self-serving FUD from a Legal Dept.

  8. Pingback: Jak Fedora řeší americká embarga | Fedora.cz

  9. Pingback: Trackback

  10. Pingback: Trackback

  11. Pingback: Trackback

  12. Pingback: Trackback

  13. Pingback: qwxgvnmkfbrvecganfhv

  14. Pingback: csevdhrbmkgnkjbhvdbjn

  15. Pingback: bgsvcvbhjfgmnbdvgbnhg

  16. Pingback: csngrdngthnfgdsfgnsfsd

  17. Pingback: cnstgakrsbrmgfnrgfv

  18. Pingback: gtcnrkmxcrlaxenfmgarmfn

  19. Pingback: ecvxdgnjgvjhmknmbknhbfxb

  20. Pingback: Trackback

  21. Pingback: Trackback

  22. Pingback: http://liencs.fr/e9s

Leave A Comment