Is Microsoft More Trusted Than FSF: Ubuntu Chief Defends Grub 2 Drop

Free Software Foundation, FSF, recently published a white paper criticizing Ubuntu’s move to drop Grub 2 in order to support Microsoft’s UEFI Secure Boot. FSF also recommend that Ubuntu should reconsider their decision. Ubuntu’s charismatic chief, Mark Shuttleworth, has finally responded stating the reason why they won’t change their stand on dropping Grub 2 from Ubuntu.

In its whitepaper FSF said:

Our main concern with the Ubuntu plan is that because they are afraid of falling out of compliance with GPLv3, they plan to drop GRUB 2 on Secure Boot systems, in favor of another bootloader with a different license that lacks GPLv3’s protections for user freedom. Their stated concern is that someone might ship an Ubuntu Certified machine with Restricted Boot (where the user cannot disable it). In order to comply with GPLv3, Ubuntu thinks it would then have to divulge its private key so that users could sign and install modified software on the restricted system.

This fear is unfounded and based on a misunderstanding of GPLv3. We have not been able to come up with any scenario where Ubuntu would be forced to divulge a private signing key because a third-party computer manufacturer or distributor shipped Ubuntu on a Restricted Boot machine. In such situations, the computer distributor — not Canonical or Ubuntu — would be the one responsible for providing the information necessary for users to run modified versions of the software.

When asked by a user during a chat organised by The Register, Mark said:

The SFLC advice to us was that the FSF could require key disclosure if some OEM screwed up. As nice as it is that someone at the FSF says they would not, we have to plan for a world where leaders change and institutional priorities change. The FSF wrote a licence that would give them the rights to take specific actions, and it’s hard for them to argue they never would!

So, does that mean Microsoft can be trusted with their keys but FSF can’t be trusted with their licence?

Lack Of Unity: Communication Gap?
FSF accuses that “No representative from Canonical contacted the FSF about these issues prior to announcing the policy. This is unfortunate because the FSF, in addition to being the primary interpreter of the license in question, is the copyright holder of GRUB 2, the main piece of GPLv3-covered software at issue.”

It is not clear is if Ubuntu team contacted FSF/SFLC on this matter. Canonical has not released any statement whether they communicated with FSF/SFLC on this matter or not.

Mark’s wordings are vague so we don’t know if they contacted the FSF and failed to reach an agreement or by ‘SFLC advice’ he was referring to the advice given in the whitepaper.

So the question arises should not open source companies contact FSF before taking such decisions as FSF is not only an authority in the matter, but also has legal expertise in the subject?

Ubuntu Has An In-House Security Expert
On the other hand Mark Shuttleworth himself has a lot of experience in security. He founded Thawte Consulting, a certificate authority (CA) for X.509 certificates, which he later sold to VeriSign for $575 million and created Ubuntu.

Slideshow Image:

About Swapnil Bhartiya

A free software fund-a-mental-ist and Charles Bukowski fan, Swapnil also writes fiction and tries to find cracks in the paper armours of proprietary companies. Swapnil has been covering Linux and Free Software/Open Source since 2005.

93 thoughts on “Is Microsoft More Trusted Than FSF: Ubuntu Chief Defends Grub 2 Drop

  1. Pingback: Trackback
  2. Pingback: Trackback
  3. Pingback: Trackback
  4. Pingback: Trackback
  5. Pingback: Trackback
  6. Pingback: burn x
  7. Pingback: Led Lights
  8. Pingback: cnn news headlines
  9. Pingback: teen sex
  10. Pingback: Find Out More
  11. Pingback: Bonuses
  12. Pingback: lamber cona e cu
  13. Pingback: phone repair
  14. Pingback: geo news live
  15. Pingback: supra uk
  16. Pingback: luxury yachts
  17. Pingback: free phone unlock
  18. Pingback: website design
  19. Pingback: deutschland
  20. Pingback: essential oils
  21. Pingback: top google ranking
  22. Pingback: leaflet delivery
  23. Pingback: Meat
  24. Pingback: carpet cleaning
  25. Pingback: news
  26. Pingback: picture fram
  27. Pingback: telescopic mast
  28. Pingback: webmaster
  29. Pingback: mp3 download
  30. Pingback: Jaz printing
  31. Pingback: water ionizer
  32. Pingback: water ionizer
  33. Pingback: smarter
  34. Pingback: Darian Braun 2014
  35. Pingback: Pinganillo Camara
  36. Pingback: online jobs
  37. Pingback: Web visitors
  38. Pingback: yellow october
  39. Pingback: emb gas
  40. Pingback: spring repair
  41. Pingback: ct videographer
  42. Pingback: funny jokes
  43. Pingback: Pinganillo
  44. Pingback: seo specialist
  45. Pingback: audi specialist
  46. Pingback: car wrapping
  47. Pingback: http://shockup.com
  48. Pingback: juegos de vestir
  49. Pingback: peixoto
  50. Pingback: cumpara hosting
  51. Pingback: BravoTube

Leave a Reply